Canada Slaps 25% Tariff as More Critics Protest Against US Trade Policy Escalation

In a sharp escalation of trade tensions, Canada has responded to U.S. protectionist policies by imposing a 25% tariff on American auto imports. The move, announced for enforcement on April 9, 2025, comes amid growing global backlash against the United States' increasingly aggressive tariff framework. 

Notably, former Biden administration official and prominent economist Brent Neiman has publicly condemned the misuse of his research by Trump-era trade policymakers, igniting a broader academic and economic debate. 

For investors, traders, and especially participants in the crypto space, the intensifying trade war signals deeper systemic fractures in traditional markets—potentially driving renewed interest in decentralized financial alternatives.

Canada Fires Back: Retaliatory Tariffs Take Effect

On April 8, 2025, Canada confirmed it will impose retaliatory tariffs on non-CUSMA-compliant U.S. vehicles. Effective April 9, these countermeasures will target fully assembled cars and components not sourced from Canada or Mexico, all at a rate of 25%.

The Canadian Department of Finance framed this as a direct response to U.S. tariffs enacted in March and early April, which include:

• 25% tariffs on Canadian automobiles,

• 10% tariffs on energy and potash exports,

• 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum.

Minister of Finance François-Philippe Champagne emphasized that these countermeasures will remain “until the U.S. eliminates its tariffs against the Canadian auto sector.” 

Minister of International Trade Dominic LeBlanc further clarified that Canada “is being needlessly and unfairly targeted” and had no choice but to defend its national economic interests.

If U.S. tariffs persist, Canada plans to expand the scope of its retaliation—potentially impacting over $155 billion worth of goods.

Read Also: Understanding Trump’s Tariff Policy: Market Turmoil and Global Trade Challenges

Economists Push Back: Brent Neiman Slams Misuse of Tariff Research

Adding intellectual weight to the mounting criticism, University of Chicago economist Brent Neiman, a former Treasury official, accused the Trump administration of distorting his tariff research to justify its policy. 

In a New York Times op-ed, Neiman pointed out that his paper was cited to support tariffs four times higher than warranted.

Key discrepancies:

• USTR's Error: Used a 25% pass-through rate, while Neiman’s study found it to be 95%, drastically skewing the justification for high tariffs.

• Misinterpretation of Deficits: Neiman criticized the oversimplification of trade deficits as inherently problematic, noting they often arise from structural economic differences—not unfair trade.

• Broken Formula: He revealed the USTR’s models failed to consider the dynamic nature of trade, such as shifting supply chains and retaliatory measures, which render their assumptions unrealistic.

Neiman’s rebuke highlights the broader issue of policymakers weaponizing academic research for politically convenient narratives—something that could erode trust and lead to ill-conceived global economic strategies.

Read Also: Trump Tariff Chaos and Its Ripple Effect on the Crypto Market

Global Fallout: China and EU Respond with Force

Canada isn’t alone in retaliating. The global stage is bristling with defensive countermeasures:

• China: On April 4, Beijing announced a 34% tariff on all U.S. imports starting April 10. Trump threatened a further 50% escalation, prompting China’s foreign ministry to label the U.S. move as “blackmail.”

• European Union: Reinstated tariffs on American bourbon and motorcycles starting April 1, with €18 billion in goods set for additional levies by mid-April.

The global reaction underscores a shifting sentiment: unilateral U.S. trade aggressions are not going unanswered. The resulting fragmentation of global trade frameworks could ripple across all sectors, from manufacturing to commodities—and notably, to crypto.

What This Means for Crypto and DeFi Markets

As traditional financial markets face growing volatility amid trade wars, many investors may start eyeing decentralized assets and blockchain-based finance as strategic hedges. 

Historically, macroeconomic instability has correlated with spikes in demand for alternative stores of value—think Bitcoin during inflation scares or stablecoins during sovereign currency devaluation.

Key implications for the crypto market:

• Supply Chain Disruption: Could boost tokenized logistics solutions.

• Currency Volatility: May drive demand for crypto as a hedge.

• De-dollarization Momentum: Tariff retaliation could accelerate global diversification away from USD-denominated assets.

Bitrue users, traders, and institutional observers would be wise to monitor these macro tensions, as cross-border friction often fuels blockchain innovation.

Read Also: Trump Tariff Chaos and Its Ripple Effect on the Crypto Market

Conclusion

The unfolding tariff dispute between the U.S. and Canada, coupled with sharp intellectual criticism from voices like Brent Neiman, reveals the dangers of politicized economics. As more countries retaliate and global trade becomes a high-stakes chess match, market participants must reassess exposure across traditional and digital asset classes. 

For those navigating uncertainty, platforms like Bitrue can serve as gateways to alternative investment ecosystems rooted in decentralization, transparency, and resilience.

FAQ

Q: Why did Canada impose a 25% tariff on U.S. vehicles?
A: In retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Canadian autos, steel, and energy exports that Canada considers unjust and harmful to its economy.

Q: Who is Brent Neiman, and why is he relevant?
A: A respected economist whose tariff study was misused by the U.S. Trade Representative to justify aggressive trade policy. He publicly criticized the distortion.

Q: What are the global consequences of U.S. tariff policies?
A: Retaliation from China and the EU, disrupted trade flows, and increasing skepticism around U.S. economic diplomacy.

Q: How might this affect crypto markets?
A: Geopolitical risk often boosts interest in decentralized assets. Investors may see crypto as a hedge against fiat instability and fragmented trade systems.

Q: Where can I learn more about how global politics affects crypto?
A: Visit Bitrue’s news and research hub for real-time insights on geopolitical events and their impact on digital assets.

Bitrue Official Website:

Website: https://www.bitrue.com/

Sign Up: https://www.bitrue.com/user/register

Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.