Behind DeepSeek's Technology: Why It's More Compelling Than OpenAI

AI development has largely been dominated by companies with access to massive resources, with OpenAI at the forefront. 

However, DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, has introduced DeepSeek-R1, an alternative that delivers comparable performance at a much lower cost.

DeepSeek-R1’s training costs were only $6 million, whereas OpenAI's GPT-4 reportedly required over $100 million. Despite the difference in resources, DeepSeek-R1 performs well in reasoning, coding, and language understanding.

This article examines DeepSeek’s technology, cost efficiency, and open-source accessibility, comparing it to OpenAI’s approach.

How DeepSeek Trains AI Differently

The training process plays a key role in determining how well an AI model performs. DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI’s GPT-4 follow different strategies, with DeepSeek focusing on efficiency while OpenAI prioritizes large-scale computing.

DeepSeek’s Approach: Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Training

DeepSeek-R1 relies on reinforcement learning, allowing the model to learn from its mistakes and refine its reasoning over time. This method improves the AI’s ability to handle tasks like coding and logic-based decision-making without excessive human intervention.

• DeepSeek-R1 was trained using 2,048 Nvidia H800 GPUs, a cost-effective alternative to high-end chips.
• It uses a feedback-based system, meaning that instead of blindly predicting text, it improves based on responses.
• This allows DeepSeek to achieve high accuracy without requiring massive datasets.

By prioritizing efficiency, DeepSeek reduces training costs while maintaining strong performance in AI benchmarks.

OpenAI’s Approach: Large-Scale Data and Computation

OpenAI takes a different approach, focusing on training models with enormous datasets and using cutting-edge hardware.

• GPT-4 reportedly required 8,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs, which are among the most expensive AI chips available.
• The model was trained on significantly larger datasets, ensuring broad knowledge coverage.
• Supervised fine-tuning played a key role, meaning that human intervention was required to improve responses.

While this method results in a highly capable model, it comes at a high cost and requires substantial resources.

DeepSeek’s method proves that strong AI models don’t always need expensive hardware or extreme amounts of data.

Cost Comparison: How DeepSeek Achieves More with Less

The cost of developing an AI model is one of the biggest barriers for new AI startups. DeepSeek’s approach is proof that AI development can be done efficiently, without requiring billion-dollar investments.

DeepSeek-R1: A Cost-Effective AI Model

DeepSeek’s training costs were around $6 million, a fraction of the estimated cost for GPT-4. By focusing on efficient hardware and optimized training, DeepSeek-R1 delivers competitive performance without the need for excessive spending.

• DeepSeek-R1 uses H800 GPUs, which are cheaper but still effective for AI training.
• Optimized algorithms allow the model to reach high performance without large datasets.
• It was built with efficiency in mind, reducing unnecessary computational costs.

This approach lowers the barriers to AI development, making it more accessible to companies that don’t have OpenAI’s level of funding.

OpenAI’s GPT-4: High Costs and Large-Scale Computing

OpenAI’s training method, while effective, relies on a budget that most AI startups can’t afford.

• The estimated cost of training GPT-4 exceeds $100 million, making it one of the most expensive AI models ever built.
• It uses high-end Nvidia H100 GPUs, which offer excellent performance but at a much higher price.
• Cloud computing expenses add to the overall cost, making maintenance and updates expensive.

While OpenAI’s strategy results in highly capable AI models, the financial investment required limits who can develop such systems.

DeepSeek proves that high-performance AI models don’t require excessive spending, making it a viable alternative for companies looking for cost-effective AI solutions.

Open-Source vs. Proprietary AI: Who Benefits the Most?

Another key difference between DeepSeek and OpenAI is how accessible their AI models are.

DeepSeek’s Open-Source Model: Encouraging Collaboration

DeepSeek has made DeepSeek-R1 open-source, allowing developers and researchers to use and improve the model without restrictions.

• The model is available under an MIT license, meaning anyone can modify and apply it.
• Developers can integrate DeepSeek-R1 into their own projects, encouraging a wider range of applications.
• It allows AI researchers to experiment with improvements, fostering innovation.

By making its model open-source, DeepSeek promotes AI development beyond corporate control, ensuring that AI advancements are widely accessible.

OpenAI’s Closed Model: Limited Access

OpenAI has taken a different route, choosing to keep GPT-4 proprietary.

• Developers can only access OpenAI’s models through paid APIs, meaning they don’t have full control over the AI.
• Customization is limited, preventing companies from fine-tuning the model for specific needs.
• OpenAI controls the model’s updates and deployment, restricting independent development.

While this ensures quality control and security, it limits accessibility and reduces the ability for smaller companies to use AI freely.

DeepSeek’s open-source model provides more flexibility, making it a better option for developers who need custom AI solutions.

Conclusion

DeepSeek’s efficient training methods, cost-effective model, and open-source approach make it a strong competitor to OpenAI.

While OpenAI still leads in large-scale AI research, DeepSeek proves that AI development doesn’t have to rely on excessive spending.

By prioritizing reinforcement learning over brute-force computing, DeepSeek-R1 achieves high performance at a fraction of the cost. Additionally, its open-source model encourages collaboration, making AI more accessible.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does DeepSeek-R1 train differently from GPT-4?

DeepSeek-R1 uses reinforcement learning to improve reasoning skills efficiently, whereas GPT-4 relies on massive datasets and human fine-tuning to enhance performance.

Why is DeepSeek-R1 significantly cheaper to develop?

DeepSeek-R1 was trained on 2,048 Nvidia H800 GPUs at a cost of $6 million, compared to GPT-4’s 8,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs and a $100 million+ training budget.

Why is DeepSeek’s open-source model important?

DeepSeek allows developers to access and modify its AI model, encouraging wider adoption, whereas OpenAI keeps its AI models proprietary and only available through paid APIs.

Investor Caution 

While the crypto hype has been exciting, remember that the crypto space can be volatile. Always conduct your research, assess your risk tolerance, and consider the long-term potential of any investment.

Bitrue Official Website:

Website: https://www.bitrue.com/

Sign Up: https://www.bitrue.com/user/register

Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.